Eneloop vs Alkaline batteries test
Please have a look to understand the difference between basic Eneloop NiMH AA batteries vs Alkaline batteries. Alkaline batteries have a large capacity at very low current. Whenever the device pulls more current the Alkaline batteries supply much less energy than eneloops. Take a look at the following comparison between a Fujitsu High Power AA and a standard Eneloop 4th generation AA.
- Compare mAh at 0,1A:
This is a low current. Clocks will use an even smaller current.
An Alkaline Fujitsu battery has a capacity of 2258mAh, while an eneloop can provide 1859mAh according to HKJ`s tests. So the Alkaline can run longer on very low currents.
- Compare mAh at 1A:
With devices that pull more current the eneloop batteries really show their strength.
The Fujitsu AA Alkaline can only provide 564mAh at this current while the eneloop still shows 1785 mAh.
- Compare mAh at 3A:
Fujitsu Alkaline now gives about 426mAh while the eneloop gives 1736mAh.
Alkaline batteries can have an advantage is very low current devices like clocks and remote controls. But at the same time come with a very big disadvantage that they can leak and destroy almost any device.
Eneloop capacity tests
HKJ is a member on forums like Candlepowerforums and Budgetlightforums and has done over 1000 tests on batteries, chargers, flashlights and other electronics. He is a reliable source for reviews and comparisons.
Eneloop capacity tests
He uses a bench power supply that can be controlled by a computer to mainstream battery tests. With that he can both adjust Voltage and Current easily. To read more about his tests setup, take a look at his website I will be linking to in the next few tests. Please note that eneloop batteries have the highest capacity after about 3-5 charges.
There are always slight different readings as well depending on the ambient temperature etc.
As you can see, that eneloop batteries can handle a much higher current than Alkalines. You can notice the slight decrease in capacity when the current increases. But even at 3A or 5A they still prove a strong contender.
AA standard model capacity test
Eneloop standard 3rd generation:
Take a look at the table and look for the Measured Capacity.
0,5A it has a capacity of about 1850 mAh.
2A it still has a capacity of 1790 mAh.
And at 5A still 1718 mAh. Go to the complete review here.
Eneloop standard 4th generation:
Again, look at the numbers behind Measured Capacity for the mAh.
0.5A a capacity of about 1883 mAh.
2A it has a capacity of 1826 mAh.
And at 5A= 1766 mAh, so even at 5A they hold up really really well! For the complete test by HKJ see here.
Eneloop std. 4th gen (2016 model):
See the Measured Capacity in mAh..
0,5A it has a capacity of about 1809 mAh.
At 2A it still has a capacity of 1760 mAh.
Not tested at 5A this time. Go to the complete review by HKJ here.
Eneloop quality comparison
Tracking of cells
Eneloops prove not only to be powerful but are high quality cells that track close to its siblings. Capacity wise and performance wise. This means that all batteries have the same power and performance without much variety/inconsistency.
You can see the lines in the graphs being always very close to each other. They are Consistent!
Cheaper cells may have bigger capacity at SOME discharge current, but many times Fail to have identical performance, are less reliable or can`t handle higher discharge currents.
Look at this example of an eneloop AA test by HKJ. You can see both batteries are on the same line. They have the same performance.
If you then compare this with a GP AA test for example, which is also a pretty good battery, you can see the 2 lines (which indicate 2 batteries) still track well, but not as close.
And the following are some cheaper rechargeable batteries which have a higher fluctuation.
You can see that the difference in performance between 2 cells when you look at the colored lines. So it is not only about max capacity it is about Consistent Performance as well.
Real Capacity vs Claimed capacity
Look at the following graph of a 2500mAh battery. Which by some people should have more capacity than a 1900mAh eneloop cell. Well, take a look and judge by yourself. Sanyo and Panasonic do real tests with real test results according to IEC and JIS standards, they don`t lie. But many companies lie about real capacity. These are one of the worst batteries you can buy.
Eneloop Cycle test: 1st gen AA vs 4th gen AA accelerated cycle testing.
Mark (also known as PowerMeUp on CPF and BLF) has done some very serious and interesting cycle testing with his Ultrasmartcharger he has built.
How many cycles?
The next graph will show an accelerated cycle testing done by him, and he explains this is not the way the cycle testing is done according to IEC or JIS standards in a laboratory conditions, but a accelerated version with higher current for both charging and discharging. But very informative!
Also, the 1st generation cells will be quite a bit older than the 4th generation cells. See his own explanation and testing here.
Eneloop Cycle test: Japanese vs Chinese eneloops.
Eneloop Cycle test: Partial cycle testing. Result: 5000+ cycles
For a very informative point of view he also tested eneloop batteries without charging and discharging them completely. As you can see in the next graph, the batteries have passed 5000 partical cycles! This will show that charge and discharge eneloops completely will reduce cycle life.
See his own explanation and testing here.
Digital camera flash (Speedlite) test
About 8 years ago Sys (a member of the Photography-on-the-net forum) completed a comparison between different rechargeable AA batteries. He used digital SLR camera flashes to check the amount of pops a set of batteries could do.
In his latest test, that he started around January or February of 2017, he included the recycle time a Flash needed between the pops. He compared Amazon Basics, Duracell, EBL, Eneloops and Powerex batteries.
There are 3 tests:
1. for the amount of pops 2 sets of the same batteries could do in 2 different Flash units and take an average of both. And compare the 2 to see which batteries could deliver the most pops. Even the 2 flash units amongst eachother had a wide difference of total pops.
2.for the recycle time between the pops. After a flash pops the flash needs to recycle in order to do the next pop. The time it takes to recycle is different amongst all batteries.
3.for the LSD rating to see how much % a set of batteries would lose charge every month. He uses a ZTS Pulse Load Multi-Battery Tester. This test is expected to end in 2018.
Keep in mind that using a battery tester is only good for averaging.
See his full story and testing here.
Test 1: Total amount of pops per set of batteries (average between 2 flash units):
Powerex 2700 Pro:Average: 400.5
Eneloop 2450 Pro: Average: 386.5
Powerex 2600: Average: 380.5
Powerex 2700: Average: 371.5
Amazon Basics 2400Average: 359.5
EBL 2800: Average: 331.5 7
Duracell 2450: Average: 297.5
Eneloop White 1900:Average: 294.5
Test 2: Recycle time between the pops:
Each brand was tested at the 5th, 100th, 200th, 300th and 400th pop. To keep it a little short I will include the 5th, 300th and 400th cycle results. See the link for the complete results.
(Sys: "Only those batteries that had 400 + flash pops from YN600EX-RT Flash “B” are ranked; no batteries had 400 + flash pops from Flash “A”")
The 5th Pop recycle time in seconds: (faster is better).
- Powerex 2700 mAh Pro @ 1.48 sec
- Amazon Basics 2400 mAh @ 1.58 sec
- Eneloop 2450 mAh Pro @ 1.64 sec
- Eneloop White 1900 mAh @ 1.68 sec
- Powerex 2700 mAh @ 1.70 sec
- Duracell 2450 mAh @ 1.78 sec
- EBL 2800 mAh @ 1.81 sec
- Powerex 2600 mah @ 1.84 sec
The 300th Pop recycle time in seconds (faster is better)
- Eneloop 2450 mAh Pro @ 2.5 sec
- Powerex 2700 mAh Pro @ 2.7 sec
- Powerex 2600 mAh @ 2.9 sec
- Amazon Basics 2400 mAh @ 3.5 sec
- Eneloop White 1900 mAh @ 3.6 sec
- EBL 2800 mAh @ 4.2 sec
- Powerex 2700 mAh @ 5.8 sec
- Duracell 2450 mAh @ 10.2 sec
The 400th pop recycle time in seconds (faster is better)
- Eneloop 2450 mAh Pro @ 3.2 sec
- Powerex 2700 mAh Pro @ 3.6 sec
- Powerex 2600 mAh @ 4.7 sec
- Powerex 2700 mAh @ 6.2 sec
Test 3: Low Self Discharge test
Still ongoing. See his thread for the current statistics.